Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:36

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Inside the first official barefoot hiking park in the US - SFGATE
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Forget Florida — these two unexpected states are the new retirement hot spots - Yahoo Finance
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Unde non omnis quia ut et magni ea.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Tooth fossil analysis upends current theory of prehistoric human evolution - Earth.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Did you become a cuckold for your wife?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sony’s DualSense Edge controller is receiving a rare $30 discount - The Verge
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: